Skip to main content

Three Methods for Determining Pareto-Optimal Solutions of Multiple-Objective Problems

  • Chapter
Directions in Large-Scale Systems

Abstract

Typical problems in system design, decision making, decentralized control, etc., and most multi-person games bear the following general formulation of multiple-objective (MO) optimization problems:

$${\text{maximize }}{{\text{z}}_{\text{1}}} = {{\text{J}}_{\text{1}}}\left( {{{\text{x}}_1}, \ldots ,{{\text{x}}_{\text{n}}}} \right), \ldots ,\,\,{\text{and}}\,{{\text{z}}_{\text{N}}} = {{\text{J}}_{\text{N}}}\left( {{{\text{x}}_{\text{1}}}, \ldots ,{{\text{x}}_{\text{n}}}} \right)\,{\text{subject to }}\left( {{{\text{x}}_1}, \ldots ,{{\text{x}}_{\text{n}}}} \right) \in {\text{X}}{\text{.}}$$
((1))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. A. Zadeh, “Optimality and Non-Scalar-Valued Performance Criteria,” IEEE Trans, Automat. Contr., vol. AC-8, pp. 59–60, Jan. 1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 3rd ed. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Y.C. Ho, “Differential Games, Dynamic Optimization, and Generalized Control Theory,” J. Optimiz. Theory Appl. vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 179–209, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. G. Lin, “On N-Person Cooperative Differential Games,” Proc. 6th Princeton Conf. Inform. Sci. Amp; Syst., Princeton, N.J., pp. 502–507, Mar. 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. C. Koopmans, “Analysis of Production as an Efficient Combination of Activities,” Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, T. C. Koopmans, Ed. New York: Wiley, pp. 33–97, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K.J. Arrow, E. W. Barankin, and D. Blackwell, “Admissible Points of Convex Sets,” Contributions to the Theory of Games, vol.II, H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker, Eds. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, pp. 87–91, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  7. N.O. Da Cuncha and E. Polak, “Constrained Minimization under Vector-Valued Criteria in Finite Dimensional Spaces,” J. Math. Anal. and Appl. vol.19, no.1, pp.103–124, July 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. G. Lin, “Multiple-Objective Optimization,” Columbia Univ., Dept. of Elect. Eng. & Comp. Sci., Syst. Res. Gr. Tech. Rept, Dec. 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. A. Katopis and J. G. Lin, “Non-Inferiority of Controls under Double Performance Objectives: Minimal Time and Minimal Energy,” Proc. 7th Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., Honolulu, Hawaii, pp. 129–131, Jan. 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. G. Lin, “Circuit Design under Multiple Performance Objectives,” Proc. 1974 IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits & Systems, San Francisco, Calif., pp. 549–552, Apr. 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.G. Lin, “Maximal Vectors and Multi-Objective Optimization,” J. Optimiz. Theory Appl., vol.18, no.1, pp.41–64, Jan. 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.G. Lin, “Proper Equality Constraints (PEC) and Maximization of Index Vectors,” J. Optimiz. Theory Appl. vol.20, no.4, Dec.1976.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.G. Lin, “Proper Inequality Constraints (PIC) and Maximization of Index Vectors” to appear in J. Optimiz. Theory Appl..

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.G. Lin, “Multiple-Objective Problems: Pareto-Optimal Solutions by Method of Proper Equality Constraints (PEC),” to appear in IEEE Trans. Automatic Control.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. G. Lin, “Multiple-Objective Programming: Lagrange Multipliers and Method of Proper Equality Constraints,” to be presented in 1976 Joint Automatic Control Conf., July 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P.L. Yu, “Cone Convexity, Cone Extreme Points, and Nondominated Solutions in Decision Problems with Multi-objectives,” J. Optimiz. Theory Appl. vol.14, no.3, pp.319–377, Sept. 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Payne, E. Polak, D. C. Collins, and W.S. Meisel, “An Algorithm for Bicriteria Optimization Based on the Sensitivity Function.” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. vol. AC-20, no. 4, pp. 546–548, Aug. 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. M. Holtzman and H. Halkin, “Directional Convexity and the Maximum Principle for Discrete Systems,” J. SIAM Contr., vol.4, no. Z, pp. Z63–Z75, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. M. Himmelblau, Applied Nonlinear Programming, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. E. Bryson and Y. C. Ho, Applied Optimal Control, Waltham, Mass.: Blaisdell, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lin, J.G. (1976). Three Methods for Determining Pareto-Optimal Solutions of Multiple-Objective Problems. In: Ho, Y.C., Mitter, S.K. (eds) Directions in Large-Scale Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2259-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2259-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-2261-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-2259-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics