Skip to main content

Practice Test # 3: Difficulty Level-Hard

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References and Suggested Readings

  • Abeloff DM, Armitage OJ. Abeloff’s clinical oncology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACC/AHA/SNM policy statement. Standardization of cardiac tomographic imaging. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 1992;33:1434–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggrenox. http://www.drugs.com/aggrenox.html. Accessed 22 Jan 2012

  • Al-Mallah HM, Sitek A, Moore CS, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion and function with PET and PET/CT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:498–513.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoli TE, Bennett JC, et al. Cecil essentials of medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antioch G, Bockish A. How to optimize CT/for PET/CT. In: Wahl R, editor. Principles and practice of PET and PET/CT. 2nd ed. Lippincott and Williams, a Walter Kluwer business: Philadelphia, PA; 2009. p. 131–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashir A, Gropler JR. Translation of myocardial metabolic imaging concepts into the clinics. Cardiol Clin. 2009;27:291–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becherer A, Szabo M, Karanikas G, et al. Imaging of advanced neuroendocrine tumors with [18]F-FDOPA PET. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1161–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bengel MF, Higuchi T, Javadi SM, et al. Cardiac positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boellaard R. Need for standardization of F-18 FDG PET/CT for treatment response assessments. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2011;52:93S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brasse D, Kinahan EP, Lartizien C, et al. Correction methods for random coincidences in fully 3D whole-body PET: impact on data and image quality. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:859–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brem FR, Petrovitch I. BSGI versus MRI for the detection of breast cancer. The Breast Journal. 2007;13(5):465–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner IA, Koshy J, Morey J, et al. The bone scan. Semin Nucl Med. 2012;42:11–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun SP, Kuszyk SB, et al. Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. RadioGraphics. 1999;19:745–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon B, Nedegaard J. Brown adipose tissue: function and physiological significance. Physiological Reviews. 2004;84(1):277–359.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castellucci P, Valentina Ambrosini V, et al. PET/CT in Neuroendocrine tumors. PET Clin. Vol. 3, No. 2, April 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian PE, Bernier DR, Langan JK. Nuclear medicine and PET: technology and techniques. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Carli MF, Lipton MJ, editors. Cardiac PET and PET/CT imaging. New York, NY: Springer; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilsizian V, Bacharach LS, Beanlands SR, et al. ASNC Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures PET myocardial perfusion and metabolism clinical imaging. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. 2009;16:651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitris G, Placantonakis GD, Schwartz HT. Localization in epilepsy. Neurol Clin. 2009;27:1015–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorbala S, Vangala D, Sampson U, et al. Value of vasodilator left ventricular ejection fraction reserve in evaluating the magnitude of myocardium at risk and the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease: A 82Rb PET/ CT study. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:349–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Early PJ, Sodee BD. Principles and practice of nuclear medicine. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahey HF. Data Acquisition in PET Imaging. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology. 2002;30:2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferri FF. Practical guide to the care of the medical patient. 7th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, et al. Recommendations on the use of (18 F) FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:480–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fong Y, Saldinger PF, Akhurst T, et al. Utility of F-18 FDG positron emission tomography on selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases. Am J Surg. 1999;178:282–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaudo HV, Katz IS, Nowak KA, et al. Multimodality imaging review of malignant pleural mesothelioma diagnosis and staging. PET Clin. 2011;6:275–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillard JH, Patel MC, Abrahams PH. et al Riedel’s lobe of the liver: fact or fiction? Clin Anat. 1998;11(1):47–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger LA. Clinical electrocardiography: a simplified approach. 7th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham MM. The clinical trials network of the society of nuclear medicine. Semin Nucl Med. 2010;40:327–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant FD, Fahey FH, Packard AB, et al. Skeletal PET with 18 F-fluoride: applying new technology to an old tracer. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:68–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hajnal GV, Hill LGD, Hawkes JD. Medical image registration (biomedical Engineering). Boca Raton, FL: CRC; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, et al. Fleischner society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology. 2008;246(3):697–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hickeson M, Abikhzer G. Review of physiologic and pathophysiologic sources of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the chest wall on PET. PET Clin. 2011;6:339–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houseni M, Chamroonrat W, Zhuang J, et al. Multimodality imaging assessment of pulmonary nodules. PET Clin. 2011;6:231–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings M. PET imaging in lymphoma. Expert Rev Hematol. 2009;2(3):261–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue K, Okada K, et al. Diffuse bone marrow uptake on F-18 FDG PET in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Clin Nucl Med. 2006;31:721–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen RT. Endocrine tumors of the gastrointestinaltract and pancreas. In: Kasper DL, Fauci AS, Longo DL, editors. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. 16th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jhanwar SY, Straus JD. The role of PET in Lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1326–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan AD. Advances in PET scanning. http://www.diagnosticimaging.com/pet-mr/content/article/113619/1877446.

  • Karakousis CG, Czerniecki JB. Diagnosis of melanoma. PET Clin. 2011;6:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kebebew E, Greenspan FS, et al. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Treatment outcome and prognostic factors. Cancer. 2005;103:1330–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein M, Cohen-Cymberknoh M, Armoni S, et al. F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT Imaging of lungs in patients with cystic fibrosis. Chest. 2009;136:1220–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korf J. Is brain lactate metabolized immediately after neuronal activity through the oxidative pathway? Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 2006;26:1584–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Rani N, et al. False-negative and false-positive results in FDG-PET and PET/CT in breast cancer. PET Clin. 2009;4:289–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Abbas KA. Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CE, Alavi A. PET and PET/CT: a clinical guide, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Thieme; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi MH. Radiation safety in nuclear medicine. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach HR, Schwarz SW. Challenges for developing PET tracers: isotopes, chemistry, and regulatory aspects. PET Clin. 2010;5:131–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machac J. Cardiac positron emission tomography imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 2005;35:17–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madden EM. Introduction to sectional anatomy workbook and board review guide (Point). 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandell LG, Bennett EJ, Dolin R. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankoff AD, Lee JH. Breast Cancer Imaging with Novel PET Tracers. PET Clin. 2009;4:371–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles AK, Blomley JKM, et al. Functional and physiological imaging in Grainger & Allison´s diagnostic radiology. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittra E, Quon A. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography: the current technology and applications. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009;47:147–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore LK, Dalley FA, Agur RMA. Clinically oriented anatomy. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morano NG, Seibyl JP. Technical overview of brain SPECT imaging: improving acquisition and processing of data. J Nucl Med Technol. 2003;31:191–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mosci C, Iagaru A. PET/CT imaging of thyroid cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36(12):180–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Coverage Determination (NCD) for PET Scans (220.6) https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/ncd-details.aspx?NCDId=211&ver=2. Accessed 14 Jan 2012

  • National Electrical Manufacturers Association. NEMA standards publication NU 2–2007: performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. Rosslyn, VA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton JA, Townsend WD, Brian F, Hutton FB. Hybrid imaging technology: from dreams and vision to clinical devices. Semin Nucl Med. 2009;39:247–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Placantonakis GD, Schwartz HT. Localization in epilepsy. Neurol Clin. 2009;27:1015–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prior JO, Quinones MJ, Hernandez-Pampaloni M, et al. Coronary circulatory dysfunction in insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2005;111:2291–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prokop M, Galanski M. Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. New York, NY: Thieme; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohren EM, Turkington TG, Coleman RE. Clinical application of PET in oncology. Radiology. 2004;231:305–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roivainen A, Forsback S, Grönroos T, et al. Blood metabolism of [methyl-11 C]choline; implications for in vivo imaging with positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:25–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saha GB. Basics of PET Imaging. New York, NY: Springer; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salskov A, Tammisetti SV, et al. FLT: measuring tumor cell proliferation in vivo with positron emission tomography and 3’-Deoxy-3’-[18 F]Fluorothymidine. Semin Nucl Med. 2007;37:429–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Crespo A, Larsson SA. The influence of photon depth of interaction and non-collinear spread of annihilation photons on PET image spatial resolution. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:940–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling K, Conti P, Adler L, et al. The role of positron emission mammography in breast cancer imaging and management. Applied Radiology. 2008;37:26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall G, Delbeke D, Stabin MG, et al. SNM practice guideline for sodium 18 F-fluoride PET/CT bone scans 10. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1813–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siemens. Cyclotron solutions synthesizing the science of PET. http://www.siemens.com/healthcare. Accessed 13 Feb 2012.

  • Soret M, Bacharach SL, Buvat I. Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2007;48:932–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sureshbabu W, Mawlawi O. PET/CT imaging artifacts. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology. 2005;33:156–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takalkar A, Agarwal A, Adams S, et al. Cardiac assessment with PET. PET Clin. 2011;6:313–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Saab G, Birnie D, et al. Is septal glucose metabolism altered in patients with left bundle branch block and ischemic cardiomyopathy? J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1763–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valk PE, Bailey DL, Townsend DW, Maisey MN, editors. Positron emission tomography: basic science and clinical practice. London: Springer; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallabhajosula S, Solnesn L, Vallabhajosula B. Broad overview of positron emission tomography radiopharmaceuticals and clinical applications: what is new? Semin Nucl Med. 2011;41:246–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl RL, Buchanan JW, editors. Principles and practice of positron emission tomography. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl LR, Jacene H. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2009;50(5):122s–50s.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl RL. Principles and practice of PET and PET/CT. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott and Wilkins; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong TZ, Lacy LJ. PET of hypoxia and perfusion with 62Cu-ATSM and 62Cu-PTSM using a 62Zn/62Cu generator. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:427–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshinaga K, Chow BJ, Williams K, et al. What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi H, Thompson C. Evolution and developments in instrumentation for positron emission mammography. PET Clin. 2009;4:317–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaret BL, Beller GA. Clinical nuclear cardiology: state of the art and future directions. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielinski M, Hauer J, Hauer L, et al. Staging algorithm for diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10(2):185–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moniuszko, A., Sciuk, A. (2013). Practice Test # 3: Difficulty Level-Hard. In: PET and PET/CT Study Guide. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2287-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2287-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-2286-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-2287-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics