Skip to main content

Incompatibility and Incongruity: Two Mechanisms Preventing Gene Transfer Between Taxa

  • Conference paper
Biotechnology and Ecology of Pollen

Abstract

Pollen-pistil incompatibility generally refers to the ubiquitous self-incompatibility (SI) phenomenon characteristic of angiosperms. Interpopulation pollen-pistil interactions resulting in malfunction also occur and often have been ascribed to the genetic system controlling SI (Lewis and Crowe, 1958; Pandey, 1969). A generally held concept unifying theoretical treatments of SI and intertaxa incompatibility is that pollen-pistil incompatibility is an active process, evolving as the result of selection. In 1973, Hoganboom proposed that failure in pollen-pistil interactions can be passive and termed this phenomenon incongruity.

Paper Number 14,543 of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Scientific Journal Article Series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ascher PD (1974) The self-incompatibility reaction in detached styles of Lilium longiflorum Thunb. injected before pollination with 6-methylpurine or puromycin. Incompatibility News 4: 57–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher PD (1975) Special stylar property required for compatible pollen-tube growth in Lilium longiflorum Thunb. Bot Gaz 136: 317–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascher PD, Campbell RJ (1983) Irreversible differentiation of pollen tubes by the self-incompatibility reaction in Lilium longiflorum Thunb. J Palyn 19: 143–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher PD, Drewlow LW (1971a) Unilateral interspecific incompatibility in Lilium. Ybk N Am Lily Soc 24:70–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher PD, Drewlow LW (1971b) Effect of stigmatic exudate injected into the stylar canal on compatible and incompatible pollen tube growth in Lilium longiflorum Thunb. In: Heslop-Harrison J (ed) Pollen: Development and physiology. Butterworths, London, pp 267–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher PD, Drewlow LW (1975) The effect of prepollination injection with stigmatic exudate on interspecific pollen tube growth in Lilium longiflorum styles. Plant Sci Let 4:401–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascher PD, Peloquin SJ (1968) Pollen tube growth and incompatibility following intra-and interspecific pollinations in Lilium longiflorum. Am J Bot 55:1230–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • East EM, Mangelsdorf AJ (1925) A new interpretation of the behavior of self-sterile plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 11:166–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstel DU (1950) Self-incompatibility studies in guayule. II. Inheritance. Genetics 35:482–506

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grun P, Aubertin M (1966) The inheritance and expression of unilateral incompatibility in Solanum. Heredity 21:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grun P, Radlow A (1961) Evolution of barriers to crossing of self incompatible with self compatible species of Solanum. Heredity 16:137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrispn BJ, Darby LA (1955) Unilateral hybridizatien. Nature 176:982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heganbppm NG (1973) A mpdel for incongruity in intimate partner relationships. Euphytica 22:219–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoganboom NG (1975) Incompatibility and incongruity: Two different mechanisms for the non-functioning of intimate partner relationships. Proc R Soc Lond B 188:361–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoganboom NG (1984) Incongruity: Non-functioning of intercellular and intracellular partner relationships through nonmatching information. In: Linskens HF, Heslop-Harrison J (eds) Cellular interactions. Springer-Verlag, pp 640–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes MB, Babcock EB (1950) Self incompatibility in Crepis foetida L. subspecies roeadifolia (Biel) Schniz et Keller. Genetics 35:570–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D, Crowe LK (1958) Unilateral interspecific incompatibility in flowering plants. Heredity 12:233–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin FW (1964) The inheritance of unilateral incompatibility in Lycopersicon hirsutum. Genetics 50:459–469

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin FW (1967) The genetic control of unilateral incompatibility between two tomato species. Genetics 56:391–398

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mather K (1943) Specific differences in petunia. I. Incompatibility. J Genet 45:215–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire DC, Rick CM (1954) Self-incompatibility in species of Lycopersicon sect. Eriopersicon and hybrids with L. esculentum. Hilgardia 23:101–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey KK (1969) Elements of the S-gene complex. V. Interspecific cross-compatibility relationships and theory of the evolution of the S complex. Genetica 40:447–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse HLK (1950) Multiple allelomorph incompatibility of pollen and style in the evolution of angiosperms. Ann Bot 14:199–216

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ascher, P.D. (1986). Incompatibility and Incongruity: Two Mechanisms Preventing Gene Transfer Between Taxa. In: Mulcahy, D.L., Mulcahy, G.B., Ottaviano, E. (eds) Biotechnology and Ecology of Pollen. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8622-3_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8622-3_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8624-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8622-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics