Abstract
Pollen-pistil incompatibility generally refers to the ubiquitous self-incompatibility (SI) phenomenon characteristic of angiosperms. Interpopulation pollen-pistil interactions resulting in malfunction also occur and often have been ascribed to the genetic system controlling SI (Lewis and Crowe, 1958; Pandey, 1969). A generally held concept unifying theoretical treatments of SI and intertaxa incompatibility is that pollen-pistil incompatibility is an active process, evolving as the result of selection. In 1973, Hoganboom proposed that failure in pollen-pistil interactions can be passive and termed this phenomenon incongruity.
Paper Number 14,543 of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Scientific Journal Article Series.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ascher PD (1974) The self-incompatibility reaction in detached styles of Lilium longiflorum Thunb. injected before pollination with 6-methylpurine or puromycin. Incompatibility News 4: 57–60
Ascher PD (1975) Special stylar property required for compatible pollen-tube growth in Lilium longiflorum Thunb. Bot Gaz 136: 317–321
Ascher PD, Campbell RJ (1983) Irreversible differentiation of pollen tubes by the self-incompatibility reaction in Lilium longiflorum Thunb. J Palyn 19: 143–151
Ascher PD, Drewlow LW (1971a) Unilateral interspecific incompatibility in Lilium. Ybk N Am Lily Soc 24:70–74
Ascher PD, Drewlow LW (1971b) Effect of stigmatic exudate injected into the stylar canal on compatible and incompatible pollen tube growth in Lilium longiflorum Thunb. In: Heslop-Harrison J (ed) Pollen: Development and physiology. Butterworths, London, pp 267–272
Ascher PD, Drewlow LW (1975) The effect of prepollination injection with stigmatic exudate on interspecific pollen tube growth in Lilium longiflorum styles. Plant Sci Let 4:401–405
Ascher PD, Peloquin SJ (1968) Pollen tube growth and incompatibility following intra-and interspecific pollinations in Lilium longiflorum. Am J Bot 55:1230–1234
East EM, Mangelsdorf AJ (1925) A new interpretation of the behavior of self-sterile plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 11:166–171
Gerstel DU (1950) Self-incompatibility studies in guayule. II. Inheritance. Genetics 35:482–506
Grun P, Aubertin M (1966) The inheritance and expression of unilateral incompatibility in Solanum. Heredity 21:131–138
Grun P, Radlow A (1961) Evolution of barriers to crossing of self incompatible with self compatible species of Solanum. Heredity 16:137–143
Harrispn BJ, Darby LA (1955) Unilateral hybridizatien. Nature 176:982
Heganbppm NG (1973) A mpdel for incongruity in intimate partner relationships. Euphytica 22:219–233
Hoganboom NG (1975) Incompatibility and incongruity: Two different mechanisms for the non-functioning of intimate partner relationships. Proc R Soc Lond B 188:361–375
Hoganboom NG (1984) Incongruity: Non-functioning of intercellular and intracellular partner relationships through nonmatching information. In: Linskens HF, Heslop-Harrison J (eds) Cellular interactions. Springer-Verlag, pp 640–654.
Hughes MB, Babcock EB (1950) Self incompatibility in Crepis foetida L. subspecies roeadifolia (Biel) Schniz et Keller. Genetics 35:570–588
Lewis D, Crowe LK (1958) Unilateral interspecific incompatibility in flowering plants. Heredity 12:233–256
Martin FW (1964) The inheritance of unilateral incompatibility in Lycopersicon hirsutum. Genetics 50:459–469
Martin FW (1967) The genetic control of unilateral incompatibility between two tomato species. Genetics 56:391–398
Mather K (1943) Specific differences in petunia. I. Incompatibility. J Genet 45:215–325
McGuire DC, Rick CM (1954) Self-incompatibility in species of Lycopersicon sect. Eriopersicon and hybrids with L. esculentum. Hilgardia 23:101–124
Pandey KK (1969) Elements of the S-gene complex. V. Interspecific cross-compatibility relationships and theory of the evolution of the S complex. Genetica 40:447–474
Whitehouse HLK (1950) Multiple allelomorph incompatibility of pollen and style in the evolution of angiosperms. Ann Bot 14:199–216
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ascher, P.D. (1986). Incompatibility and Incongruity: Two Mechanisms Preventing Gene Transfer Between Taxa. In: Mulcahy, D.L., Mulcahy, G.B., Ottaviano, E. (eds) Biotechnology and Ecology of Pollen. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8622-3_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8622-3_42
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8624-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8622-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive