Skip to main content

Labor and Capitalist Accumulation in the Late Twentieth Century: What and Who is Flexible?

  • Chapter
The Transition to Flexibility
  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

A recent Wall Street Journal article reported the new UAW assembly line workers that Chrysler and Ford are currently hiring are far better-educated than their current work force. The UAW is opposed to this effort to hire better-educated workers. Ex-UAW president Fraser was quoted as saying “Let’s face it, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to work on the assembly line (Templin, 1994).” During the last decade of the twentieth century there have been intense changes underway in the global political economy and these changes are profoundly impacting how we think about labor and labor relations. The proximate cause for this rethinking is the remarkable success of Japanese capitalism. Trying to understand the changes labor is experiencing is, in effect, to try to explain the changes in capitalism itself. As Say er and Walker (1992) aptly point out, there is a reworking and a new, more powerful integration of the global division of labor. This is reflected in and is an aspect of a far deeper and more profound globalization of the wage labor relationship. Importantly, though capitalism has always accumulated on a world scale, in the current period it is penetrating new regions with the intent of integrating the inhabitants into the global marketplace as producers. As importantly, like a virus, it is constantly mutating its surface coating (i.e., labor relations, interfirm relations, the role of managers etc.), while reproducing its essential genetic code. Thus, its tremendous flexibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abo, T. (Ed.). (1994). Hybrid Factory: The Japanese Production System in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. (1993). “Time-And-Motion Regained,” Harvard Business Review 71, (1): pp. 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. and Cole, R. (1993). “Designed for Learning: A Tale of Two Auto Plants,” Sloan Management Review (Spring): pp. 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aglietta, M. (1979). A Theory of Capitalist Regulation. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. (1988). Information, Incentives and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aronowitz, S. (1973). False Promises. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barff, R. and Austen, J. (1993). “‘It’s Gotta Be Da Shoes’: Domestic Manufacturing, International Subcontracting, and the Production of Athletic Footwear,” Environment and Planning A 25 (8): pp. 1103–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S. and Piore, M. (1980). Dualism and Discontinuity in Industrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonazzi, G. (1994). “Between Post-Fordism and the Japanese Model: Cognitive Processes in European and American Sociology,” unpublished mimeo, Department of Social Sciences, University of Torino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (1990). The Regulation School: A Critical Introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. and Reich, M. (1989). “When Does Union-Management Cooperation Work: A Look at NUMMI and GM-Van Nuys,” California Management Review 31, (4): pp. 26–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. (1989). Strategies for Learning. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coriat, B. (1991). Penser a l’Envers. Paris: Christian Bourgois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, J. (1993). “The Flexibility Fetish: a Review Essay on Flexible Specialization,” Capital and Class 51: pp. 49–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVroey, M. (1984). “A Regulation Approach Interpretation of the Contemporary Crisis,” Capital and Class 23: pp. 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz. A. (1993). “Industrial Governance in Latin America.” Paper presented at the SSRC Workshop on Industiral Governance and Labor Flexibility in Comparative Perspective, September 17–19, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohse, K.; Jurgens, U.; and Malsch, T. (1986). “From Fordism to Toyotism? The Social Organization of the Labor Process in the Japanese Automobile Industry,” Politics and Society 14, (2): pp. 45–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaghu, M. and Barff, R.A. (1990). “Nike Just Did It: International Subcontracting and Flexibility in Athletic Footware Production,” Regional Studies 24, (6): pp. 537–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. and Kenney, M. (1992). “Restructuring in Place: Japanese Investment, Production Organization and the Restructuring of Steel,” Economic Geography 68, (2): pp. 146–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fruin, W.M. (1992). The Japanese Enterprise System: Competitive Strategies and Cooperative Structures. Oxford: Clarendon Press and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G. (1992). “New Realities of Industrial Development in East Asia and Latin America.” In R. Appelbaum and J. Henderson (Eds.), States and Development in the Asian Pacific Rim, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 85–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gareffi, G. and Korzeniewicz, M. (Eds.). (1994). Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. (1985). The Evolution of Labor Relations in Japan: Heavy Industry, 1853–1955. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamper, B. (1991). Rivethead. New York: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1985). The Urbanization of Capital. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity. London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, T. and Wallerstein, I. (1986). “Commodity Chains in the World Economy Prior to 1800,” Review 10, (1): pp. 157–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, T. and Steven, R. (1993). Is Japanese Management Post-Fordism? London: Mado-sha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M. and Florida, R. (1988). “Beyond Mass Production: Production and the Labor Process in Japan,” Politics and Society 16, (1): pp. 121–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M. and Florida, R. (1993). Beyond Mass Production: The Japanese System and Its Transfer to the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M. and Florida, R. (1994). “Japanese Maquiladoras: Production Organization and Global Commodity Chains,” World Development 22, (1): pp. 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M.; Romero, J.; and Cho, D. (1994). “Japanese and Korean Investment in the Maquiladoras: What Role in Global Commodity Chains?” Paper prepared for the International Conference on The Maquiladoras in Mexico: Present and Future Prospects of Industrial Development held at the Colegio de la Frontera Norte, Mexico from May 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koike, K. (1988). (Translated by M. Saso). Understanding Industrial Relations in Japan. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krafcik, J. (1986). “Learning from NUMMI,” MIT International Motor Vehicle Program Internal Working Paper 15, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyotani, E. (1994). Seminar at Institute of Governmental Affairs, University of California, Davis, February 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipietz, A. (1987). Mirages and Miracles. London: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • NUMMI. (1986). “New United Motor Manufacturing Inc. and the United Automobile Workers: Partners in Training,” Case Study for the ILO/Turin Center Seminar on Labor-Management Cooperation in Training and Retraining, May 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M. and Slaughter, J. (1988). “Management by Stress,” Technology Review (October): pp. 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, C. and Freeman, C. (1985). “Microelectronics, Long Waves and World Structural Change,” World Development 13, (3): pp. 441–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pine, B. (1993). Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. and Sabel, C. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. (1991). The Work of Nations. New York: Alfred Knopf, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roobeek, A. (1987). “The Crisis of Fordism and the Rise of New Technological Paradigm,” Futures 19, (2) 129–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer,A. (1986). “New Developments in Manufacturing: The Just-In-Time System,” Capital and Class 30: pp. 42–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer,A. (1989). “Postfordism in Question,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 13, (4): pp. 666–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. and Walker, R. (1992). The New Social Economy. London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklair, L. (1989). Assembling for Development. Boston: Unwin Hyman, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templin, N. (1994). “Auto Plants, Hiring Again, Are Demanding Higher-skilled Labor,” Wall Street Journal (March 11): pp. Al, A8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton, D. (1994). “The Management of Manufacturing Flexibility,” California Management Review 36, (2): pp. 72–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Auto Workers. (1991). “Agreement Between New United Motor Manufacturing Inc. and the UAW,” July 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J.; Jones, D.; and Roos, D. (1990). The Machine that Changed the World. New York: Rawson and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. (1988). In the Age of the Smart Machine: the Future of Work and Power. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kenney, M., Curry, J. (1996). Labor and Capitalist Accumulation in the Late Twentieth Century: What and Who is Flexible?. In: Knudsen, D.C. (eds) The Transition to Flexibility. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1425-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1425-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8619-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1425-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics