Skip to main content

The Use of Reference Priors and Bayes Factors in the Analysis of Clinical Trials

  • Conference paper
Statistical Models in Epidemiology, the Environment, and Clinical Trials

Part of the book series: The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications ((IMA,volume 116))

  • 1994 Accesses

Abstract

This paper was motivated by foundational issues that underlie the application of Bayesian methods. Advances in numerical methods and computation make applying Bayesian methods relatively easy, so now as a discipline we can step back and contemplate what these new tools will allow us to do with respect to the theoretical foundations of our work, and if desired, adjust our actions accordingly. The foundational issues that this paper will address are the use of reference priors and the use of Bayes factors in the analysis of clinical trials. The question that merges these two foundational issues is “Should data analysis and decision-making be approached as two separate tasks or should there be a seamless integration with each stage of the clinical trial being viewed as a subsequent step in a sequential decision-making problem?”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berger J.O., Robust Bayesian analysis: sensitivity to the prior, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 25, 1990, pp. 303–328.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Berry D.A., Interim analysis in clinical trials: classical versus Bayesian approaches, Statistics in Medicine, 4, 1985, pp. 521–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berry, D.A., Interim analysis in clinical trials: The role of the likelihood principle, The American Statistician, 41, 1987, pp. 117–122.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Berry, D.A., Interim analysis in clinical research, Cancer Invest., 5, (1988a), pp. 469–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berry, C.A., Multiple comparisons, multiple tests, and data dredging: A Bayesian perspective with discussion). In Bayesian Statistics 3, (eds. J.M. Bernardo, M.H. DeGroot, D.V. Lindley, and A.F.M. Smith), Oxford University Press, (1988b), pp. 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berry, D.A., Monitoring accumulating data in a clinical trial, Biometrics, 45, 1989a, pp. 1197–1211.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Berry, D.A., Inferential aspects of adaptive allocation rules, Proceedings of the Pharmaceutical Section of the American Statistical Association, ASA, Washington DC, 1989c, pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berry D.A., Bayesian methodology in phase III trials, Drug Information Association Journal, 25, 1991, pp. 345–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berry DA, Experimental design for drug development: A Bayesian approach, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 1, 1991, pp. 81–101.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Berry, D.A., A case for Bayesianism in clinical trials (with discussion), Statistics in Medicine, 12, 1993, pp. 1377–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berry, D.A., Decision analysis and Bayesian methods in clinical trials, In Recent Advances in Clinical Trial Design and Analysis, (ed. P. Thall), Kluwer Press, New York, 1995, pp. 125–154.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Berry D.A., and Fristedt, B., Bandit Problems: Sequential Allocation of Experiments, London: Chapman-Hall, 1985.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Berry, D.A., and Hardwick, J., Using historical controls in clinical trials: Application to ECMO, Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics V, New York: Springer-Verlag, (eds. Berger JO, Gupta S), 1993, pp. 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Berry, D.A., and Eick, S.G., Adaptive assignment versus balanced randomization in clinical trials: A decision analysis, Statistics in Medicine, 14, 1994, pp. 231–246.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Berry, D.A., and Ho, C.H., One-sided sequential stopping boundaries for clinical trials: A decision-theoretic approach, Biometrics, 44, 1988, pp. 219–227.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Berry, D.A., Wolff, M.C., and Sack, D., Public health decision making: A sequential vaccine trial (with discussion), In Bayesian Statistics, (eds. Bernardo JM, Berger JO, Dawid AP, Smith AFM), Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1992, pp. 79–96.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Berry, D.A., Wolff, M.C., and Sack, D., Decision making during a phase III randomized controlled trial, Controlled Clinical Trials, 15, 1994, pp. 360–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Breslow, N., Biostatistics and Bayes, Statistical Science, 5, 1990, pp. 269–284.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Brophy J.M., and Joseph, L., Placing trials in context using Bayesian analysis: Gusto revisited by Reverend Bayes, Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(11), 1995, pp. 871–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Carlin, B.P., and Louis, T.A., Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods for Data Analysis, Chapman and Hall, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carlin, B.P., Chaloner, K. M., Louis, T.A., and Rhame, F.S., Elicitation, monitoring, and analysis for an AIDS clinical trial, In Case Studies in Bayesian Statistics: Volume II, (eds. C. Gatsonis, J. Hodges, R. Kass, and N. Singpur-walla), Springer, 1995, pp. 48–84.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chaloner, K., Elicitation of Prior Distributions, In Bayesian Biostatistics, (eds. D.A. Berry and D.K. Stangl), Marcel Dekker, 1996, pp. 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chaloner, K., Church, T., Matts, J.P., and Louis, T.A., Graphical elicitation of a prior distribution for an AIDS clinical trial, The Statistician, 42, 1993, pp. 341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Craig, P.S., Goldstein, M., Seheult, A.H., and Smith, J.A., Constructing partial prior specifications for models of complex physical systems, The Statistician, 47(1), 1998, pp. 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gail, M., A discussion of: Bayesian approaches to randomized trials, J. Royal Statistical Soc. Ser. A, 157, 1995, pp. 357–416.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., and Rubin, D. B., Bayesian Data Analysis, Chapman & Hall, London, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Greenhouse J.B., and Wasserman, L., A practical, robust method for Bayesian model selection: A case study in the analysis of clinical trials, Paper presented at the American Statistical Association Meetings, Carnegie-Mellon Technical Report #626, 1995a.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Greenhouse, J.B., and Wasserman, L., Robust Bayesian methods for monitoring clinical trials, Statistics in Medicine, 14, 1995b, pp. 1379–1391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Greenhouse, J.B., On some applications of Bayesian methods in cancer clinical trials, Statistics in Medicine, 11, 1992, pp. 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hilden, J. and Habbema, J., The marriage of clinical trials and clinical decision science, Statistics in Medicine, 9, 1990, pp. 1243–1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hively, W., The mathematics of making up your mind, Discover, May 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kadane, J.B., and Wolfson, L. J., Priors for the design and analysis of clinical trials, In Bayesian Biostatistics, D. Berry and D. Stangl (eds.), Marcel Dekker, New York 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kadane, J.B., and Wolfson, L. J., Experiences in elicitation, The Statistician, 47(1), 1998, pp. 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kadane, J.B., and Dickey, J.M., Bayesian decision theory and the simplification of models, In Evaluation of Econometric Models, (eds. J. Kmenta and J. Ramsey), Academic Press, 1980, pp. 245–268.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lavine, M., and Schervish, M., Bayes factors: What they are and what they are not, The Statistician, 1999, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lindley, D., A discussion of: Bayesian approaches to randomized trials, J. Royal Statistical Soc. Ser. A, 157, 1995, pp. 357–416

    Google Scholar 

  37. O’Hagan, A., Eliciting expert beliefs in substantial practical applications, The Statistician, 47(1), 1998, pp. 21–35.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Parmigiani, G., Ancukiewicz, M. and Matchar, D., Decision models in clinical recommendations development: The stroke prevention policy model, In Bayesian Biostatistics, ed. D.A. Berry and D.K. Stangl, Marcel Dekker, 1996, pp. 207–233.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Parmigiani, G. and Kamlet, M.S., A cost-utility analysis of alternative strategies in screening for breast cancer, In Case Studies in Bayesian Statistics, (eds. C. Gatsonis, J. Hodges, R. Kass, and N. Singpurwalla, Springer-Verlag, 1993, pp. 390–402.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sargent, D. and Carlin, B.P., Robust Bayesian design and analysis of clinical trials via prior partitioning (with discussion), IMS Lecture Note Series: Second International Workshop on Bayesian Robustness, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Simes, R.J., Application of statistical decision theory to treatment choices: Implications for the design and analysis of clinical trials, Statistics in Medicine, 5, 1986, pp. 411–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Spiegelhalter, D.J., Freedman, L.S., and Parmar, M.K., Bayesian approaches to randomized trials, J. Royal Statistical Soc. Ser. A, 157, 1994, pp. 357–416.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Stangl, D., Prediction and decision making using Bayesian hierarchical models, Statistics in Medicine, 14, 1995, pp. 2173–2190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. The Gusto Investigators, An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction, N. Engl. J. Med., 329, 1993, pp. 673–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wasserman, L., Recent methodological advances in robust Bayesian inference, In Bayesian Statistics IV, (eds. J.M. Bernardo, M.H. DeGroot, D.V. Lindley, and A.F.M. Smith), Oxford University Press, 1992, pp. 483–502.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stangl, D. (2000). The Use of Reference Priors and Bayes Factors in the Analysis of Clinical Trials. In: Halloran, M.E., Berry, D. (eds) Statistical Models in Epidemiology, the Environment, and Clinical Trials. The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications, vol 116. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1284-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1284-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7078-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1284-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics