Abstract
A small research company chooses too complicated and formalized an organization structure for its young age and limited size. It flounders in rigidity and bureaucracy for several years and is finally acquired by a larger company.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See, for example, William H. Starbuck, ‘Organizational Metamorphosis’, in Promising Research Directions, edited by R. W. Millman and M. P. Hottenstein (Tempe, Arizona, Academy of Management, 1968) p. 113.
I have drawn on many sources for evidence: (a) numerous cases collected at the Harvard Business School; (b) Organization Growth and Development, edited by William H. Starbuck (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971),
where several studies are cited, and (c) articles published in journals, such as Lawrence E. Fouraker and John M. Stopford, ‘Organization Structure and the Multinational Strategy’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 1, 1968, p. 47;
and Malcolm S. Salter, ‘Management Appraisal and Reward Systems’, Journal of Business Policy, vol. 1, no. 4, 1971.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1989 Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Greiner, L.E. (1989). Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow. In: Asch, D., Bowman, C. (eds) Readings in Strategic Management. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_25
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-51809-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20317-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)