Skip to main content

University-Based Biotechnology Spin-Offs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Bioentrepreneurship

Part of the book series: International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship ((IHSE,volume 4))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It should be noted that it is unclear, whether participating in collaborative network causes the success of individual organization really. Probably, projects with higher probability of success are accepted by research partner for collaborative work.

  2. 2.

    Again, it should be stated that correlation does not indicate causality.

References

  • Aldrich H, Zimmer C (1990) Entrepreneurship through social networks. California Management Review 33 (1): 3–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyres N, Liebeskind J (1996) Privatizing the intellectual commons: Universities and the commercialization of biotechnology. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 35: 427–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzeni S (1997) Entrepreneurship. The OECD Observer 209, December 1997/January 1998: 18–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio E (1997) ‘Atomistic’ and ‘systemic’ approaches to research on new, technology-based firms: A literature study. Small Business Economics 9: 195–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum JAC, Calabrese T, Silverman BS (2000) Don't do it alone: Alliance network composition and the startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal 21 (Special issue): 267–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P, Wacquant L (1992) An invitation to reflexive sociology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt R (1997) The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 339–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler D (1998) France seeks scientific entrepreneurs. Nature 393 (6682): 203

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo MG, Grilli L (2005) Founder's human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research Policy 34: 795–816

    Google Scholar 

  • Degroof JJ, Roberts EB (2004) Overcoming weak entrepreneurial infrastructure for academic spin-offs ventures. Journal of Technology Transfer 29: 327–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz H (1998) The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research Policy 27: 823–833

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz H (2002) Incubation of incubators: Innovation as a triple helix of university–industry–government networks. Science and Public Policy 29: 115–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz H (2003) Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy 32: 109–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz H, Webster A, Gebhardt C, Terra BRC (2000) The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy 29: 313–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz H, Benner L, Guaranys A, Maculan M, Kneller R (2005) Managed capitalism: Intellectual property and the rise of the entrepreneurial university in the US, Sweden, Brazil and Japan. Paper presented at Druid Summer conference, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman PM (2001) Where science comes to life: University bioscience, commercial spin-offs, and regional economic development. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 2: 345–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnyawali DR, Madhavan R (2001) Corporative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review 26: 431–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati R (1998) Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal 19: 293–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall DT (ed) (1996) The career is dead – long live the career: A relational approach to careers. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney M (1986) Biotechnology: The university–industry complex. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney M, Goe WR (2004) The role of social embeddedness in professional entrepreneurship: A comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford. Research Policy 33: 691–707

    Google Scholar 

  • Kets de Vries MFR (1996) The anatomy of the entrepreneur: Clinical observations. Human Relations 49: 853–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby D (2006) Creating entrepreneurial universities in the UK: Applying entrepreneurship theory to practice. Journal of Technology Transfer 31 (5): 599–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebeskind JP, Oliver AL, Zucker L, Brewer M (1996) Social networks, learning and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organization Science 7: 428–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindelö, Löen H (2004) Proximity as a resource base for competitive advantage: University–industry links for technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer 29 (3/4): 311–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Link AN, Scott JT (2005) Opening the ivory tower's door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of US university spin-offs companies. Research Policy 34: 1106–1112

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe CR (2005) Commercialization and spin-out activities of the Institute of Biotechnology. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology 11 (4): 305–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (1996) Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review 21: 135–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton R (1973) The sociology of science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner JB (1997) A psychological typology of successful entrepreneurs. Quorum Books, Westport, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris MH (1998) Entrepreneurial intensity: Sustainable advantages for individuals, organizations, and societies. Quorum, Westport, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery DC, Sampat BN (2005) The Bayh–Dole Act of 1980 and university–industry technology transfer: A model for other OECD governments? Journal of Technology Transfer 30 (1/2): 115–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray F (2004) The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life. Research Policy 33: 643–659

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaou N, Birley S (2003) Academic networks in a trichotomous categorization of university spinouts. Journal of Business Venturing 18: 333–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge creating company. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak MJ, Grantham CE (2000) The virtual incubator: Managing human capital in the software industry. Research Policy 29: 125–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver AL (2001) Strategic alliances and the learning life-cycle of biotechnology firms. Organization Studies 22: 467–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver AL (2004) Biotechnology entrepreneurial scientists and their collaborations. Research Policy 33: 583–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver AL (2005) University–industry collaborations: Contrasting metaphors of linear and chaotic networking processes. Working Paper, Department of Sociology, Hebrew University, Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver AL, Ebers M (1998) Networking network studies – An analysis of conceptual configurations in the study of inter-organizational relations. Organization Studies 19: 549–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver AL, Liebeskind JP (1998) Three levels for networking for intellectual capital in biotechnology: Implications for studying interorganizational networks. International Studies of Management and Organization 27 (4): 76–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver AL, Liebeskind JP (2006) Public research and intellectual property rights: A tale of two inventions. Working paper, Department of Sociology, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  • O'shea R, Allen TJ, O'Gorman C, Roche F (2004) Universities and technology transfer: A review of academic entrepreneurship literature. Irish Journal of Management 25: 11–29

    Google Scholar 

  • O'shea R, Allen TJ, Chevalier A, Roche F (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer, and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy 34: 994–1009

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2003) The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: Assessing the importance of experience and connectivity. Research Policy 32 (9): 1695–1711

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 116–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell WW, White DR, Kupot KW, Owen-Smith J (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaborations in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology 110: 1132–1205

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane S (2004) Academic entrepreneurship: University spin-offs and wealth creation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane S, Stuart T (2002) Organizational endowment and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science 48 (1): 154–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi B (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review 61: 674–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Looy B, Callaert J, Debackere K (2006) Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? Research Policy 35: 596–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Vohora A, Wright M, Lockett A (2004) Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy 33: 147–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer A, George VP (2004) Reach out or reach within? Performance implications of alliance and location in biotechnology. Managerial and Decision Economics 25: 437–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker LG, Darby MR (1996) Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 93: 12709–12916

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker LG, Darby MR, Brewer MB (1998) Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. The American Economic Review 88: 290–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker LG, Darby MR, Armstrong J (2002) Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science 48: 138–153

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oliver, A.L. (2008). University-Based Biotechnology Spin-Offs. In: Patzelt, H., Brenner, T. (eds) Handbook of Bioentrepreneurship. International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship, vol 4. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48345-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics