Skip to main content

Barrier Creams and Emollients

  • Chapter
Irritant Dermatitis
  • 1328 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 289.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Diepgen TL, Coenraads PJ. The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of occupational dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2000; pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P. Do barrier creams and gloves prevent or provoke contact dermatitis? Am J Contact Dermatitis 1998; 9:100–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Efficacy of barrier creams (skin protective creams). In: Elsner P, Merk HF, Maibach HI (eds) Cosmetics. Controlled efficacy studies and regulation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1999; pp 156–166

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P. Protective creams. In: Elsner P, Maibach HI (eds) Cosmeceuticals. Drugs vs. cosmetics. Marcel Dekker, New York, 2000; pp 189–195

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhai H, Anigbogu A, Maibach HI. Treatment of irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of occupational dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2000; pp 402–411

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P. Barrier creams and emollients. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of occupational dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2000; pp 490–496

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frosch PJ, Kurte A, Pilz B. Biophysical techniques for the evaluation of skin protective creams. In: Frosch PJ, Kligman AM (eds) Noninvasive methods for the quantification of skin functions. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1993; pp 214–222

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lachapelle JM. Efficacy of protective creams and/or gels. In: Elsner P, Lachapelle JM, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Prevention of contact dermatitis. (Curr Probl Dermatol) Karger, Basel, Heidelberg New York, pp 182–192

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Percutaneous penetration (Dermatopharmacokinetics) in evaluating barrier creams. In: Elsner P, Lachapelle JM, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Prevention of contact dermatitis. (Curr Probl Dermatol) Karger, Basel, 1996; pp 193–205

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Models assay for evaluation of barrier formulations. In: Menné T, Maibach HI (eds) Hand eczema, 2nd (edn). CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2000; pp 333–337

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goh CL, Gan SL. Efficacies of a barrier cream and an afterwork emollient cream against cutting fluid dermatitis in metalworkers: a prospective study. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 31:176–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Guillemin M, Murset JC, Lob M, Riquez J. Simple method to determine the efficiency of a cream used for skin protection against solvents. Br J Ind Med 1974; 31:310–316

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahmoud G, Lachapelle JM. Evaluation of the protective value of an antisolvent gel by laser Doppler flowmetry and histology. Contact Dermatitis 1985; 13:14–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lodén M. The effect of 4 barrier creams on the absorption of water, benzene, and formaldehyde into excised human skin. Contact Dermatitis 1986; 14:292–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Moisturizers in preventing irritant contact dermatitis: an overview. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 38:241–244

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hannuksela A. Moisturizers in the prevention of contact dermatitis. In: Elsner P, Lachapelle JM, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Prevention of contact dermatitis. (Curr Probl Dermatol) Karger, Basel 1996; pp 214–220

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mathias CGT. Prevention of occupational contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 3:742–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Davidson CL. Occupational contact dermatitis of the upper extremity. Occup Med 1994; 9:59–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boman A, Wahlberg JE, Johansson G. A method for the study of the effect of barrier creams and protective gloves on the percutaneous absorption of solvents. Dermatologica 1982; 164:157–160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McClain DC, Storrs F. Protective effect of both a barrier cream and a polyethylene laminate glove against epoxy resin, glyceryl monothioglycolate, frullania, and tansy. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1992; 13:201–205

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mellström GA, Johansson S, Nyhammar E. Barrier effect of gloves against cytostatic drugs. In: Elsner P, Lachapelle JM, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Prevention of contact dermatitis. (Curr Probl Dermatol) Karger, Basel, 1996; pp 163–169

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Effect of barrier creams: human skin in vivo. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 35:92–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Birmingham D. Prevention of occupational skin disease. Cutis 1969; 5:153–156

    Google Scholar 

  24. Estlander T, Jolanki R, Kanerva L. Rubber glove dermatitis: a significant occupational hazard: prevention. In: Elsner P, Lachapelle JM, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Prevention of contact dermatitis. (Curr Probl Dermatol) Karger, Basel, 1996; pp 170–176

    Google Scholar 

  25. Amin S, Maibach HI. Immunologic contact urticaria definition. In: Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI (eds) Contact urticaria syndrome. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1997; pp 11–26

    Google Scholar 

  26. Frosch PJ, Schulze-Dirks A, Hoffmann M, Axthelm I. Efficacy of skin barrier creams. (II). Ineffectiveness of a popular „skin protector“ against various irritants in the repetitive irritation test in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 29:74–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Frosch PJ, Kurte A. Efficacy of skin barrier creams. (IV). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) with a set of 4 standard irritants. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 31:161–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Orchard S. Barrier creams. Dermatol Clin 1984; 2:619–629

    Google Scholar 

  29. Marks JG Jr, Fowler JF Jr, Sherertz EF, Rietschel RL. Prevention of poison ivy and poison oak allergic contact dermatitis by quaternium-18 bentonite. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 33:212–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reiner R, Roßmann K, Hooidonk CV, Ceulen BI, Bock J. Ointments for the protection against organophosphate poisoning. Arzneim-Forsch/Drug Res 1982; 32:630–633

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhai H, Buddrus DJ, Schulz AA, Wester RC, Hartway T, Serranzana S, Maibach HI. In vitro percutaneous absorption of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) in human skin decreased by quaternium-18 bentonite gels. In Vitro Molecul Toxicol 1999; 12:11–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Packham CL. Evaluation of barrier creams: an in vitro technique on human skin (letter). Acta Derm Venereol 1994; 74:405

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wigger-Alberti W, Maraffio B, Wernli M, Elsner P. Selfapplication of a protective cream. Pitfalls of occupational skin protection. Arch Dermatol 1997; 133:861–864

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wigger-Alberti W, Maraffio B, Wernli M, Elsner P. Training workers at risk for occupational contact dermatitis in the application of protective creams: efficacy of a fluorescence technique. Dermatol 1997; 195:129–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Goh CL. Cutting oil dermatitis on guinea pig skin. (I). Cutting oil dermatitis and barrier cream. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 24:16–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Frosch PJ, Schulze-Dirks A, Hoffmann M, Axthelm I, Kurte A. Efficacy of skin barrier creams. (I). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 28:94–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Treffel P, Gabard B, Juch R. Evaluation of barrier creams: an in vitro technique on human skin. Acta Derm Venereol 1994; 74:7–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Federal Register. Skin protectant drug products for overthe-counter human use. 1983; 48:6832

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gabard B. Testing the efficacy of moisturizers. In: Elsner P, Berardesca E, Maibach HI (eds) Bioengineering of the skin: water and the stratum corneum. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1994; pp 147–167

    Google Scholar 

  40. Goh CL. Cutting oil dermatitis on guinea pig skin. (II). Emollient creams and cutting oil dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 24:81–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lane AT, Drost SS. Effects of repeated application of emollient cream to premature neonates’ skin. Pediatrics 1993; 92:415–419

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lodén M, Andersson AC. Effect of topically applied lipids on surfactant-irritated skin. Br J Dermatol 1996; 134:215–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hannuksela A, Kinnunen T. Moisturizers prevent irritant dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1992; 72:42–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Gammal CE, Pagnoni A, Kligman AM, Gammal SE. A model to assess the efficacy of moisturizers — the quantification of soap-induced xerosis by image analysis of adhesive-coated discs (D-Squames®). Clin Exp Dermatol 1996; 21:338–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ramsing DW, Agner T. Preventive and therapeutic effects of a moisturizer. An experimental study of human skin. Acta Derm Venereol 1997; 77:335–337

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhai H, Leow YH, Maibach HI. Human barrier recovery after acute acetone perturbation: an irritant dermatitis model. Clin Experi Dermatol 1998; 23:11–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhai H, Poblete N, Maibach HI. Sodium lauryl sulphate damaged skin in vivo in man: a water barrier repair model. Skin Res Technol 1998; 4:24–27

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lodén, M. Barrier recovery and influence of irritant stimuli in skin treated with a moisturizing cream. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 36:256–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Schleicher SM, Milstein HJ, Ilowite R, Meyer P. Response of hand dermatitis to a new skin barrier-protectant cream. Cutis 1998; 61:233–234

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Lodén M, Andersson AC, Lindberg M. Improvement in skin barrier function in patients with atopic dermatitis after treatment with a moisturizing cream (Canoderm®). Br J Dermatol 1999; 140:264–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Gånemo A, Virtanen M, Vahlquist A. Improved topical treatment of lamellar ichthyosis: a double-blind study of four different cream formulations. Br J Dermatol 1999; 141:1027–1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Berndt U, Wigger-Alberti W, Gabard B, Elsner P. Efficacy of a barrier cream and its vehicle as protective measures against occupational irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 42:77–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. de Paepe K, Derde MP, Roseeuw D, Rogiers V. Claim substantiation and efficiency of hydrating body lotions and protective creams. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 42:227–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhai, H., Maibach, H.I. (2006). Barrier Creams and Emollients. In: Chew, AL., Maibach, H.I. (eds) Irritant Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31294-3_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31294-3_52

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00903-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31294-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics