Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Diepgen TL, Coenraads PJ. The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of occupational dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2000; pp 3–16
Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P. Do barrier creams and gloves prevent or provoke contact dermatitis? Am J Contact Dermatitis 1998; 9:100–106
Zhai H, Maibach HI. Efficacy of barrier creams (skin protective creams). In: Elsner P, Merk HF, Maibach HI (eds) Cosmetics. Controlled efficacy studies and regulation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1999; pp 156–166
Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P. Protective creams. In: Elsner P, Maibach HI (eds) Cosmeceuticals. Drugs vs. cosmetics. Marcel Dekker, New York, 2000; pp 189–195
Zhai H, Anigbogu A, Maibach HI. Treatment of irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of occupational dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2000; pp 402–411
Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P. Barrier creams and emollients. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of occupational dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2000; pp 490–496
Frosch PJ, Kurte A, Pilz B. Biophysical techniques for the evaluation of skin protective creams. In: Frosch PJ, Kligman AM (eds) Noninvasive methods for the quantification of skin functions. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1993; pp 214–222
Lachapelle JM. Efficacy of protective creams and/or gels. In: Elsner P, Lachapelle JM, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Prevention of contact dermatitis. (Curr Probl Dermatol) Karger, Basel, Heidelberg New York, pp 182–192
Zhai H, Maibach HI. Percutaneous penetration (Dermatopharmacokinetics) in evaluating barrier creams. In: Elsner P, Lachapelle JM, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Prevention of contact dermatitis. (Curr Probl Dermatol) Karger, Basel, 1996; pp 193–205
Zhai H, Maibach HI. Models assay for evaluation of barrier formulations. In: Menné T, Maibach HI (eds) Hand eczema, 2nd (edn). CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2000; pp 333–337
Goh CL, Gan SL. Efficacies of a barrier cream and an afterwork emollient cream against cutting fluid dermatitis in metalworkers: a prospective study. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 31:176–180
Guillemin M, Murset JC, Lob M, Riquez J. Simple method to determine the efficiency of a cream used for skin protection against solvents. Br J Ind Med 1974; 31:310–316
Mahmoud G, Lachapelle JM. Evaluation of the protective value of an antisolvent gel by laser Doppler flowmetry and histology. Contact Dermatitis 1985; 13:14–19
Lodén M. The effect of 4 barrier creams on the absorption of water, benzene, and formaldehyde into excised human skin. Contact Dermatitis 1986; 14:292–296
Zhai H, Maibach HI. Moisturizers in preventing irritant contact dermatitis: an overview. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 38:241–244
Hannuksela A. Moisturizers in the prevention of contact dermatitis. In: Elsner P, Lachapelle JM, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Prevention of contact dermatitis. (Curr Probl Dermatol) Karger, Basel 1996; pp 214–220
Mathias CGT. Prevention of occupational contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 3:742–748
Davidson CL. Occupational contact dermatitis of the upper extremity. Occup Med 1994; 9:59–74
Boman A, Wahlberg JE, Johansson G. A method for the study of the effect of barrier creams and protective gloves on the percutaneous absorption of solvents. Dermatologica 1982; 164:157–160
McClain DC, Storrs F. Protective effect of both a barrier cream and a polyethylene laminate glove against epoxy resin, glyceryl monothioglycolate, frullania, and tansy. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1992; 13:201–205
Mellström GA, Johansson S, Nyhammar E. Barrier effect of gloves against cytostatic drugs. In: Elsner P, Lachapelle JM, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Prevention of contact dermatitis. (Curr Probl Dermatol) Karger, Basel, 1996; pp 163–169
Zhai H, Maibach HI. Effect of barrier creams: human skin in vivo. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 35:92–96
Birmingham D. Prevention of occupational skin disease. Cutis 1969; 5:153–156
Estlander T, Jolanki R, Kanerva L. Rubber glove dermatitis: a significant occupational hazard: prevention. In: Elsner P, Lachapelle JM, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Prevention of contact dermatitis. (Curr Probl Dermatol) Karger, Basel, 1996; pp 170–176
Amin S, Maibach HI. Immunologic contact urticaria definition. In: Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI (eds) Contact urticaria syndrome. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1997; pp 11–26
Frosch PJ, Schulze-Dirks A, Hoffmann M, Axthelm I. Efficacy of skin barrier creams. (II). Ineffectiveness of a popular „skin protector“ against various irritants in the repetitive irritation test in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 29:74–77
Frosch PJ, Kurte A. Efficacy of skin barrier creams. (IV). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) with a set of 4 standard irritants. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 31:161–168
Orchard S. Barrier creams. Dermatol Clin 1984; 2:619–629
Marks JG Jr, Fowler JF Jr, Sherertz EF, Rietschel RL. Prevention of poison ivy and poison oak allergic contact dermatitis by quaternium-18 bentonite. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 33:212–216
Reiner R, Roßmann K, Hooidonk CV, Ceulen BI, Bock J. Ointments for the protection against organophosphate poisoning. Arzneim-Forsch/Drug Res 1982; 32:630–633
Zhai H, Buddrus DJ, Schulz AA, Wester RC, Hartway T, Serranzana S, Maibach HI. In vitro percutaneous absorption of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) in human skin decreased by quaternium-18 bentonite gels. In Vitro Molecul Toxicol 1999; 12:11–15
Packham CL. Evaluation of barrier creams: an in vitro technique on human skin (letter). Acta Derm Venereol 1994; 74:405
Wigger-Alberti W, Maraffio B, Wernli M, Elsner P. Selfapplication of a protective cream. Pitfalls of occupational skin protection. Arch Dermatol 1997; 133:861–864
Wigger-Alberti W, Maraffio B, Wernli M, Elsner P. Training workers at risk for occupational contact dermatitis in the application of protective creams: efficacy of a fluorescence technique. Dermatol 1997; 195:129–133
Goh CL. Cutting oil dermatitis on guinea pig skin. (I). Cutting oil dermatitis and barrier cream. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 24:16–21
Frosch PJ, Schulze-Dirks A, Hoffmann M, Axthelm I, Kurte A. Efficacy of skin barrier creams. (I). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 28:94–100
Treffel P, Gabard B, Juch R. Evaluation of barrier creams: an in vitro technique on human skin. Acta Derm Venereol 1994; 74:7–11
Federal Register. Skin protectant drug products for overthe-counter human use. 1983; 48:6832
Gabard B. Testing the efficacy of moisturizers. In: Elsner P, Berardesca E, Maibach HI (eds) Bioengineering of the skin: water and the stratum corneum. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1994; pp 147–167
Goh CL. Cutting oil dermatitis on guinea pig skin. (II). Emollient creams and cutting oil dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 24:81–85
Lane AT, Drost SS. Effects of repeated application of emollient cream to premature neonates’ skin. Pediatrics 1993; 92:415–419
Lodén M, Andersson AC. Effect of topically applied lipids on surfactant-irritated skin. Br J Dermatol 1996; 134:215–220
Hannuksela A, Kinnunen T. Moisturizers prevent irritant dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1992; 72:42–44
Gammal CE, Pagnoni A, Kligman AM, Gammal SE. A model to assess the efficacy of moisturizers — the quantification of soap-induced xerosis by image analysis of adhesive-coated discs (D-Squames®). Clin Exp Dermatol 1996; 21:338–343
Ramsing DW, Agner T. Preventive and therapeutic effects of a moisturizer. An experimental study of human skin. Acta Derm Venereol 1997; 77:335–337
Zhai H, Leow YH, Maibach HI. Human barrier recovery after acute acetone perturbation: an irritant dermatitis model. Clin Experi Dermatol 1998; 23:11–13
Zhai H, Poblete N, Maibach HI. Sodium lauryl sulphate damaged skin in vivo in man: a water barrier repair model. Skin Res Technol 1998; 4:24–27
Lodén, M. Barrier recovery and influence of irritant stimuli in skin treated with a moisturizing cream. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 36:256–260
Schleicher SM, Milstein HJ, Ilowite R, Meyer P. Response of hand dermatitis to a new skin barrier-protectant cream. Cutis 1998; 61:233–234
Lodén M, Andersson AC, Lindberg M. Improvement in skin barrier function in patients with atopic dermatitis after treatment with a moisturizing cream (Canoderm®). Br J Dermatol 1999; 140:264–267
Gånemo A, Virtanen M, Vahlquist A. Improved topical treatment of lamellar ichthyosis: a double-blind study of four different cream formulations. Br J Dermatol 1999; 141:1027–1032
Berndt U, Wigger-Alberti W, Gabard B, Elsner P. Efficacy of a barrier cream and its vehicle as protective measures against occupational irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 42:77–80
de Paepe K, Derde MP, Roseeuw D, Rogiers V. Claim substantiation and efficiency of hydrating body lotions and protective creams. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 42:227–234
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhai, H., Maibach, H.I. (2006). Barrier Creams and Emollients. In: Chew, AL., Maibach, H.I. (eds) Irritant Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31294-3_52
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31294-3_52
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00903-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31294-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)