Skip to main content

Abstract

The availability of sex-disaggregated data in the fields of research, technology and development is extremely important for supporting the growing political commitment to promote and monitor women participation in the different fields of S&T. During the late 1990s the European Commission identified as a priority the availability of this data. Even if scientific publications and patents are widely accepted indicators of scientific and technological performances, until now it has been impossible to measure bibliometric and patent output by gender in a large set of data. Starting from a feasibility study carried out for the European Commission on the whole set of patents published in 1998 by the European Patent Office and on 30,000 authors of items published in 1995 on scientific journals of international relevance, the paper demonstrates that it is possible to obtain robust gender indicators on S&T output.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bochow, M., Joas, H. (1987). Wissenschaft und Karriere, der berufliche Verbleib der akademischen Mittelbaus. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanelli, G., Segnana, M.L., Soci, A. (1999).Attività didattica, visibilità e pubblicazioni dei giovani economisti italiani. Una prospettiva di genere. In Carabelli, A., Parisi, D., Rosselli, A., 1999, Che genere di economista? Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J.R., Cole, S. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Cesare, R., Luzi, D., Valente, A. (2003). La produzione scientifica del Cnr nelle scienze sociali: considerazioni di genere. In A. Valente, D. Luzi (Eds.), Partecipare la scienza. Roma: Biblink (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission — Directorate-General for Research, Science and Society. (2003). She figures: women and science, statistics and indicators. EUR 20733.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission — Directorate-General for Research, Knowledge-based economy and society competitiveness, economic analysis and indicators (2003). Third European Report on science and technology indicators, towards a knowledge based economy. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S., Mc Gregor, E. (1996). The conceptual framework. In World Science Report (pp. 303–324). Paris: Unesco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S.H., Sullivan, L.M., Dukes, K.A., Phillis, C.F., Kelch, R.P., Schaller, J.G. (1996). Sex differences in academic advancement, England Journal of Medicine, 335, 1282–1289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J.S. (Ed.). (2001). From Scarcity to Visibility: Gender Differences in the Careers of Doctoral Scientist and Engineers. Panel for the study of gender differences in career outcomes of science and engineering Ph.D.s. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J.S. (1992). Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces, 71 (1), 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naldi, F., Vannini Parenti, I. (2002). Scientific and technological performance by gender — A feasibility study on patents and bibliometric indicators. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, et al. (2000). ETAN Report science policies in the European Union — promoting excellence through mainstreaming gender equality. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomba, R. (ed.) (2000). Figlie di Minerva. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siltanen, J., et al. (1995). Gender inequicity in the labour market. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnert, G., Holton, G. (1996). Career pattern of women and men in sciences. American Scientist, 84, 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verspagen, B., van Moergastel, T., Slabbers, M. (1994). MERIT concordance table: IPC — ISIC (rev.2). RM1994-004, http://www.merit.unimaas.nl/publications.

  • Xie, Y., Shauman, K.A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity. New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, Official Journal of the American Sociological Association, 63, 847–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H., Cole, J.R., Bruer, J.T. (Eds.). (1992). The outer circle, women in scientific community. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Naldi, F., Luzi, D., Valente, A., Vannini Parenti, I. (2004). Scientific and Technological Performance by Gender. In: Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics