Abstract
The profile deviation perspective on fit (Venkatraman 1989; Drazin & Van de Ven 1985; Donaldson 2001) has been used frequently in organization design to investigate how design affects performance. Because most studies have opted for empirical profiles, its theoretical underpinnings are underdeveloped. This, in turn, may lead research to underestimate the true impact from organization design on performance. In order to address such shortcomings, we use the information ‘processing view’ (Galbraith 1973, Tushman & Nadler 1978; Burton & Obel 2004) to develop a theoretical profile. We then use this profile to consider how three currently unresolved issues concerning external vs. internal misfits, the relative importance of different misfits and asymmetric misfits may be understood and tested in terms of the profile deviation perspective.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barlett, C.A., and Ghoshal, S., 1991, Global Strategic Management: Impact on new Frontiers of Strategy Research, Strategic Management Journal, 12 Special Issue: 5–16.
Burton, R., and Obel, B., 1998, Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: Developing Theory for Application, 2nd ed., Kluwer, Boston.
Burton, R., and Obel, B., 2004, Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit, 3rd ed., Kluwer, Boston.
Burton, R., Lauridsen, J., and Obel, B., 2002, Return on assets loss from situational and contingency misfits, Management Science, 48(11): 1461–1485.
Donaldson, L., 1996, Structural contingency theory, In: Handbook of Organization Studies, Sage, London, pp. 57–76.
Donaldson, L., 2001, The Contingency Theory of Organizations, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Drazin, R., and Van de Ven, A., 1985, Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 514–539.
Galbraith, J., 1974, Organization design: An IP view. Interfaces, 4(3): 28–37.
Galbraith, J., 1977, Organization Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading.
Gates, S., and Egelhoff, W., 1986, Centralization in headquarters-subsidiary relationships. Journal of International Business Studies, Summer: 71–92.
Hofer, C., and Schendel, D., 1978, Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts. West Publishing Company, St. Paul.
Huselid, M., 1995, The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate performance, Academy of Management Journal, 38(3): 635–672.
Katz, D., and Kahn, R., 1966, The Social Psychology of Organizations. Wiley, New York.
Kaufmann, S., 1993, The Origins of Order. Oxford University Press, New York.
Knoll, K., and Jarvenpaa, S., 1994, Information Technology Alignment or “Fit” in Highly Turbulent Environments: the Concept of Fflexibility. Proceedings of the 1994 computer personnel research conference on reinventing IS, ACM Press, New York.
Levinthal, D., 1997, Adaptation on rugged landscapes, Management science, 43(7): 934–950.
March, J., and Simon, H., 1958, Organizations, Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge.
Miller, D., 1991, Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and management, Management science, 37(1): 34–52.
Miller, D., 1992, Environmental fit versus internal fit, Organization science, 3(2): 159–178.
Nadler, D., and Tushman, M., 1978, IP as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review, (July): 613–624.
Nadler, D., and Tushman, M., 1997, Competing by Design: The Power of Organizational Architecture, Oxford University Press, New York.
Naman, J., and Slevin, D., 1993, Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical results, Strategic management journal, 14:137–153.
Rivkin, J.W., 2000, Imitation of Complex Strategies, Management Science, 46(6): 824–844.
Russo, M., and Harrison, N., 2005, Organizational design and environmental performance: Clues from the electronics industry, Academy of Management Journal, 48(4): 582–593.
Schoonhoven, C.B., 1981, Problems with Contingency Theory: Testing Assumptions Hidden within the Language of Contingency “Theory”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3): 349–377.
Siggelkow, N., 2001, Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne, Academy of Management Journal, 44(4): 838–857.
Thompson, J.D., 1967, Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Tushman, M.L., and Nadler, D.A., 1978, Information processing as an integrating concept in organization design, Academy of Management Review, 3(3): 613–624.
Tushman, M., and Romanelli, E., 1985, Organizational Evolution, in: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation, L. Staw, and B.M. Cummings, JAI Press, Greenwich.
Van de Ven, A.H., Delbecq, A.L., Koenig, R. Jr., 1976, Determinants of coordination modes within organizations, American Sociological Review, 41(2): 322–338.
Venkatraman, N., 1989, The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence, Academy of Management Review, 14(3): 423–444.
Venkatraman, N., and Camillus, J., 1984, Exploring the concept of “fit” in strategic management, Academy of Management Review, 9(3): 513–525.
Venkatraman, N., and Prescott, J., 1990, Environment-strategy coalignment: An empirical test of its performance implications, Strategic Management Journal, 11: 1–23.
Whetten, D.A., 1989, What constitutes a theoretical contribution?, Academy of Management Review, 14 (Oct.), 490–495.
Zajac, E., Kratz, M., and Bresser, R., 2000, Modelling the dynamics of strategic fit: a normative approach to strategic change, Strategic Management Journal, 21: 429–453.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klaas, P., Lauridsen, J., Håkonsson, D.D. (2006). New Developments in Contingency Fit Theory. In: Burton, R.M., Håkonsson, D.D., Eriksen, B., Snow, C.C. (eds) Organization Design. Information and Organization Design Series, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34173-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34173-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-34172-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-34173-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)