Regular Article
The Diversification of Citrus clementina Hort. ex Tan., a Vegetatively Propagated Crop Species

https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.2001.1008Get rights and content

Abstract

Clementines, due to their high quality, are one of the most important cultivated citrus mandarins. As in the case of sweet orange and satsuma mandarins, genetic variability within this species is minimal when analyzed by molecular markers, because the existing varieties have not been obtained through hybridization, but through the selection of spontaneous mutations affecting traits of agronomic interest. This would explain, at least in part, the greater diversity for agronomic traits when compared to the variability for molecular markers. Another possible (nonexclusive) reason is that the types of molecular marker used are not focused on the kind of molecular change mainly involved in the origination of new clementine cultivars; i.e., are all sources of variation equally involved in the diversification of these plants? To answer this question, different kinds of markers based on primers of random sequence, simple sequence repeats, and retrotransposon sequences that may reveal point mutations, and somatic recombination and transposon activity, respectively, were used to compare the level of variability among 24 clementine varieties. Their ISSR, RAPD, and AFLP analysis provided only two polymorphic bands, distinguishing just two varieties. No variability was found by SSRs, i.e., no new allele arising through somatic recombination was detected. Instead, the amplification of sequences adjacent to retrotransposons yielded a higher number of polymorphisms (14.6 vs 2.4% for the previous mentioned marker types). Two geographical distant groups, one from North Africa and the other from Spain, have evolved in agreement with polymorphisms based on IRAP markers anchored to, at least, two different Copia-like retrotransposon sequences. Therefore, this study suggests that the DNA of this type of mobile elements is evolving faster than the DNA of other markers in this clonal lineage.

References (45)

  • J. Lewis et al.

    DNA methylation and chromatin structure

    FEBS Lett.

    (1991)
  • M.J. Ası́ns et al.

    Citrus and Prunus copia-like retrotransposons

    Theor. Appl. Genet.

    (1999)
  • M.B. Bitonti et al.

    Nuclear and genomic changes in floating and submerged buds and leaves of heterophyllous waterchestnut (Trapa natans)

    Physiol. Plant.

    (1996)
  • R. Bono

    Variedades cultivadas

    Comunitat Valenciana Agraria

    (1996)
  • A. Brandes et al.

    Comparative analysis of the chromosomal and genomic organization of Ty1-copia-like retrotransposons in pteridophytes, gymnosperms and angiosperms

    Plant. Mol. Biol.

    (1997)
  • P.T.H. Brown

    DNA methylation in plants and its role in tissue culture

    Genome

    (1989)
  • P.T.H. Brown et al.

    RFLP analysis of Zea mays callus cultures and their regenerated plants

    Theor. Appl. Genet.

    (1991)
  • J.W. Cameron et al.

    Genetics, breeding and nucellar embryony

  • L.L. Cavalli-Sforza et al.

    Phylogenetic analysis: Models and estimation procedures

    Evolution

    (1967)
  • H.D. Coletta-Filho et al.

    Analysis of the genetic diversity among mandarins (Citrus ssp.) using RAPD markers

    Euphytica

    (1998)
  • S.L. Dellaporta et al.

    A plant DNA minipreparation: Version ii

    Plant. Mol. Biol. Rep.

    (1983)
  • P. Donini et al.

    AFLP fingerprinting reveals pattern differences between template DNA extracted from different plant organs

    Genome

    (1997)
  • T.H.N. Ellis et al.

    Polymorhism of insertion sites of Ty1-copia class retrotransosons and its use for linkage and diversity analysis in pea

    Mol. Gen. Genet.

    (1998)
  • D.Q. Fang et al.

    Fingerprinting citrus cultivars with Inter-SSR markers

    Proc. Int. Soc. Citric.

    (1996)
  • D.Q. Fang et al.

    Identification of closely related citrus cultivars with intersimple sequence repeat markers

    Theor. Appl. Genet.

    (1997)
  • C.T. Federici et al.

    Phylogenetic relationships within the genus Citrus (Rutaceae) and related genera as revealed by RFLP and RAPD analysis

    Theor. Appl. Genet.

    (1998)
  • E.J. Finnegan et al.

    DNA methylation in plants

    Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol.

    (1998)
  • A.J. Flavell et al.

    Ty1-copia group retrotransposons are ubiquitous and heterogeneous in higher plants

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (1992)
  • R.M. Harding et al.

    The evolution of tandemly repetitive DNA: Recombination rules

    Genetics

    (1992)
  • R. Herrero et al.

    Genetic diversity in the orange subfamily Aurantoideae. I. Intrspecies and intragenus genetic variability

    Theor. Appl. Genet.

    (1996)
  • J.S. Heslop-Harrison et al.

    The chromosomal distributions of Ty1-copia group retrotransposable elements in higher plants and their implications for genome evolution

    Genetica

    (1997)
  • H. Hirochika

    Retrotransposons of rice: Their regulation and use for genome analysis

    Plant. Mol. Biol.

    (1997)
  • Cited by (149)

    • Transcriptome profiling and identification of the functional genes involved in berry development and ripening in Vitis vinifera

      2019, Gene
      Citation Excerpt :

      The ‘90-1’ and ‘Luopuzaosheng’ are new early ripening bud mutants of ‘Zhana’ and ‘Jingya’, respectively (Zhang et al., 2002, 2005). Spontaneous mutants have been researched, and the molecular mechanisms of bud mutants have been classified into gene mutation, transposon activity, DNA methylation or various combinations of these effects (Franks et al., 2002; Breto et al., 2001). Considering the complexity of the mutants and the difficulties of the traditional molecular biology research in Vitis vinifera, the clarification of grape spontaneous mutants had been retarded.

    • Huanglongbing: Pathogen detection system for integrated disease management – A review

      2016, Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Identified sources of resistance may be incorporated by conventional means of breeding or advanced molecular techniques (Table 8). Cultivated germplasm usually has a lower degree of genetic diversity due to continued artificial selection on few economically important traits such as yield and quality (Coletta et al., 1998; Bretó et al., 2001). It may happen that some valuable sources of resistance may be washed out during this selection.

    • Genomics and the Contrasting Dynamics of Annual and Perennial Domestication

      2015, Trends in Genetics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Somatic mutations have also generated phenotypic variability that has become the basis for new varieties of Citrus and grape, among others [65,83,84]. An unknown but appreciable number of these mutations may be caused by transposable elements (TEs) [84–86] (see Outstanding Questions). Somatic mutations have contributed to the formation of new fruit crop varieties, but we know little about the mechanism and rates of their generation or about the proportion that are deleterious.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: 34961390240. E-mail: [email protected].

    View full text