Regular ArticleMESSAGE FORMAT AND AUDIENCE VALUES: INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF UNCERTAINTY INFORMATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES ON PERCEIVED RISK
References (37)
Uncertainty in systems reliabilities management: Insights gained from European benchmark exercises
Nuclear Engineering and Design
(1986)- et al.
How people respond to contingent valuation questions—A verbal protocol analysis of willingness-to-pay for an environmental regulation
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
(1994) - et al.
A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit
Risk Analysis
(1994) - et al.
Bayesian inference: Combining base rates with opinions of sources who vary in credibility
Journal of Personality & Social Psychology
(1983) Risk perception: Main issues, approaches and findings
- et al.
Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
(1992) - Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management, 1997, Risk assessment and risk management in regulatory decision...
- et al.
The new environmental paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results
Journal of Environmental Education
(1978) - et al.
Coming to terms with the impact of communication on scientific and technological risk judgements
- et al.
Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference
Psychological Review
(1985)
Confronting Uncertainty in Risk Management
Risk perception and communication unplugged: Twenty years of process
Risk Analysis
Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance
Quarterly Journal of Economics
Risk and recreancy: Weber, the division of labor, and the rationality of risk perceptions
Social Forces
Ambiguity and rationality
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
Subjective judgements by climate experts
Environmental Science & Technology
Perceived risk, dread, and benefits
Risk Analysis
Guidance on Risk Characterization for Risk Managers and Risk Assessors
Cited by (48)
Mediating effect of environmental orientation on pro-environmental purchase intentions in a low-involvement product situation
2017, Australasian Marketing JournalCitation Excerpt :Polonsky (2011) discusses the difficulty of going green as being partly attributed to a lack of long-term thinking within society, and inter-relates myopia and environmental problems. This point may also be associated to Kuhn's (2000) argument that many negative effects of environmental threats are not salient to consumers, possibly because they are not immediately noticeable, resulting in individuals failing to think about environmental factors long-term (Greitemeyer, 2013; Polonsky et al., 2014; Urien and Kilbourne, 2011). When it comes to the understanding of sustainability, a number of studies have demonstrated that being future-oriented is a predictor of pro-environmental behavior (Carmi, 2013; Milfont and Gouveia, 2006).
Social media mediated interaction with peers, experts and anonymous authors: Conversation partner and message framing effects on risk perception and sense-making of organic food
2017, Food Quality and PreferenceCitation Excerpt :Providing information on both the benefits and the risks of eating organic food, without emphasising one or the other, might induce a feeling of uncertainty, as no straightforward conclusion can be drawn. Uncertainty may induce individuals to use their initial attitude as a heuristic to evaluate the information they receive (Kuhn, 2000). When the conversation partner is uncertain about how to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of eating organic food, initial attitudes may thus be an important determinant of risk perception and sense-making.
A review of uncertainty research in impact assessment
2015, Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewCitation Excerpt :For instance, several studies across various disciplines in the environmental sciences have examined how best to communicate scientific information (e.g., Janssen et al., 2005; Patt and Dessai, 2005), the forms in which it should be displayed (e.g., Ibrekk and Morgan, 1987), the implications of adopting numerical versus verbal representations (e.g., Stephens et al., 2012), and how different forms of information communication are perceived by the public (e.g., Ekwurzel et al., 2011; Pidgeon, 2012). Kuhn (2000), for example, argue that disclosure and retrieval of uncertainty information should concentrate on how the targeted audience perceives uncertainty since, notwithstanding its importance, such information may not always be appreciated or of interest to them (see Wardekker et al., 2008). Much of the research on uncertainty communication is based on the notion that increasing knowledge about uncertainties can increase a decision maker's awareness and allow them to better orient their decision-making approach to identify more preferred, or less risky choices (see Geneletti et al., 2003).
Uncertainty and decision making: Volcanic crisis scenarios
2014, International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionCitation Excerpt :However, Kuhn [54] cautions that if we do communicate a range of uncertainty estimates, decision makers may focus more on either side of a range of uncertainty estimates around an “anchor probability”, resulting in the risk posed being attenuated or amplified (p. 43). This selective interpretation of uncertainty can be due to an alignment of pre-existing attitudes and beliefs (Lord et al. as cited in [54, p. 43]), and can be used as a reason to discount the seriousness of any threat or justify a particular political agenda. In addition, other studies have suggested that communicating uncertainty can decrease people׳s trust in, and credibility of, the provider [43,42,99,68,110], and that it can allow people to justify inaction or their own agenda, or to perceive the risk as being higher or lower than it is, depending on their attitudes.
Avoiding climate change uncertainties in Strategic Environmental Assessment
2013, Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewThe effects of communicating uncertainty around statistics, on public trust
2023, Royal Society Open Science