Elsevier

Journal of Catalysis

Volume 207, Issue 2, 25 April 2002, Pages 237-246
Journal of Catalysis

Regular Article
Pathways for Y Zeolite Destruction: The Role of Sodium and Vanadium

https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2002.3517Get rights and content

Abstract

A large amount of research in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) has focused on understanding the destructive role of vanadium, since it is a major issue for catalyst performance during the cracking of residuum-containing feeds. Here, we establish a mechanism for the destruction of Y zeolite which ties the roles of sodium and vanadium together and explains their synergy. Understanding pathways for Y destruction is necessary to improve FCC performance. Y zeolite destruction in the presence of steam occurs via two pathways: steam hydrolysis of framework Al and direct attack by sodium species. For low Na+ Y zeolite, steam hydrolysis of framework Al is the main cause of zeolite collapse. In such a pathway, rapid healing of framework tetrahedral holes by Si species from silica-enriched matrices stabilizes the zeolite. In the second pathway, sodium is responsible for zeolite hydrothermal instability. Sodium reacts with steam to form an active center, a surface NaOH, for zeolite destruction. All our observations are rationalized by proposing that the key to destruction lies in the ease of formation and availability of NaOH. It is the basic OH entity that attacks the framework Si–O bonds. Vanadium does not engender a new destructive pathway. At 970–1100 K in the presence of air and steam, V will be, as suggested by others, in a surface mobile state in an acidic form. This V species reacts with cationic sodium, facilitating its release from the Y exchange site. The sodium metavanadate thus formed hydrolyzes in steam to form NaOH and metavanadic acid, which may again react with Na+ cations. Here, as in the V-free case, NaOH is the destructive agent, with formation of the basic OH entity again being the key. The role of vanadium is to catalyze and facilitate the formation of NaOH. And the mechanism of Y destruction, NaOH attacking Si–O, remains the same whether V is present or not. Without sodium, V itself has little effect on Y zeolite stability, regardless of zeolite unit cell size.

References (30)

  • R.A. Beyerlein et al.

    Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal.

    (2001)
  • P.O. Fritz et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1989)
  • J. Scherzer

    Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal.

    (1993)
  • L.A. Pine et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1984)
  • R.F. Wormsbecher et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1986)
  • C.A. Trujillo et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1997)
  • L.A. Pine

    J. Catal.

    (1990)
  • X. Liu et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1998)
  • J.R. Sohn et al.

    Zeolites

    (1986)
  • P. Gelin et al.

    Appl. Catal.

    (1991)
  • P. Gelin et al.

    Appl. Catal.

    (1988)
  • M.L. Occelli et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (1999)
  • M.W. Anderson et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1990)
  • R.A. Beyerlein et al.

    Symposium on Fundamental Chemistry of Promoters and Poisons in Heterogeneous Catalysis , New York

    (1986)
  • Cited by (90)

    • Comparison of an in situ and an incorporated FCC catalyst under iron contamination

      2022, Catalysis Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      Gasoline conversion is defined as the weight fraction of coke, gasoline, liquified petroleum gas, and dry gas. Normally, Y zeolite unit cell size determines activity for FCC catalysts containing similar amounts of Y zeolite [20]. Bottoms conversion is defined similarly to gasoline conversion, except that light cycle oil (LCO) is also considered a converted product.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected].

    View full text