Elsevier

Journal of Catalysis

Volume 199, Issue 2, 25 April 2001, Pages 224-235
Journal of Catalysis

Regular Article
The Relation between Morphology and Hydrotreating Activity for Supported MoS2 Particles

https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2000.3158Get rights and content

Abstract

Supported Mo–sulfide catalysts were structurally characterized by means of transmission electron microscopy (TEM), dynamic oxygen chemisorption (DOC), and EXAFS. The catalysts show the well-known MoS2 slab structures with a multilayered morphology in the case of Mo/SiO2 and Mo/ASA. The MoS2 edge dispersion was evaluated from the TEM micrographs. While sulfidation of Mo/Al2O3 results in a highly dispersed, mostly single–layered MoS2 phase, a decreased metal–support interaction (NTA addition) or use of supports with a lower metal–support interaction leads to a higher stacking degree concomitant with a loss in edge dispersion. Combined TEM and DOC results reveal that Mo/C has the highest MoS2 dispersion. Reaction rate constants corrected for MoS2 dispersion for hydrodesulfurization (HDS) and hydrogenation (HYD) of thiophene and dibenzothiophene and HYD of toluene were measured. In general, HYD rates increase with an increasing stacking degree attributed to a less hampered planar adsorption geometry of reactants on multilayered MoS2. In contrast to the HDS rate constant of the small thiophene molecule, the DBT HDS rate constant is also strongly dependent on the stacking degree. It is concluded that perpendicular adsorption via sulfur is favored for HDS of thiophene, while in the DBT case a planar adsorption geometry is preferred. Carbon is the preferred support for the HYD of thiophene and toluene, most likely due to the large fraction of corner sites. A real support effect is also found for Mo/ASA, which exhibits low intrinsic HDS activities compensated by very high HYD activity. The present results indicate that the selectivities for hydrodesul-furization and hydrogenation can be fine-tuned by the morphology of the MoS2 phase and the choice of support.

References (38)

  • F. Delannay

    Appl. Catal.

    (1985)
  • S. Eijsbouts et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (1993)
  • E. Payen et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1994)
  • K. Klier

    Catal. Today

    (1992)
  • M. Daage et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1994)
  • J.P.R. Vissers et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1987)
  • R. Bezman

    Catal. Today

    (1992)
  • S. Kasztelan et al.

    Appl. Catal.

    (1984)
  • E.J.M. Hensen et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2000)
  • H.R. Reinhoudt et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1998)
  • S. Eijsbouts

    Appl. Catal. A

    (1997)
  • S.M.A.M. Bouwens et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1994)
  • A. Wambeke et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1988)
  • H.R. Reinhoudt et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2001)
  • N.N. Sauer et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1989)
  • D.H. Broderick et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1982)
  • W.R.A.M. Robinson et al.

    Fuel Proc. Techn.

    (1999)
  • H. Topsøe et al.

    Hydrotreating Cata-lysis

    (1996)
  • Cited by (393)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: University of Amsterdam, Instituut voor Technische Scheikunde, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected].

    2

    National Centre for HREM, Delft University of Technology, Rotterdamseweg 137, 2628 AL Delft, The Netherlands.

    3

    Interfacultair Reactor Instituut, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 15, 2629 JB Delft, The Netherlands.

    View full text