Reviews
Pharmacokinetics and in vivo drug release rates in liposomal nanocarrier development

https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.21358Get rights and content

Abstract

Liposomes represent a widely varied and malleable class of drug carriers generally characterized by the presence of one or more amphiphile bilayers enclosing an interior aqueous space. Thus, the pharmacological profile of a particular liposomal drug formulation is a function not only of the properties of the encapsulated drug, but to a significant extent of the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and drug release rates of the individual carrier. Various physicochemical properties of the liposomal carriers, the drug encapsulation and retention strategies utilized, and the properties of the drugs chosen for encapsulation, all play an important role in determining the effectiveness of a particular liposomal drug. These properties should be carefully tailored to the specific drug, and to the application for which the therapeutic is being designed. Liposomal carriers are also amenable to additional modifications, including the conjugation of targeting ligands or environment-sensitive triggers for increasing the bioavailability of the drug specifically at the site of disease. This review describes the rationale for selecting optimal strategies of liposomal drug formulations with respect to drug encapsulation, retention, and release, and how these strategies can be applied to maximize therapeutic benefit in vivo.

Section snippets

INTRODUCTION

Liposomes constitute a class of microparticulate or nanoparticulate drug carriers generally characterized by the presence of one or more amphiphile bilayers enclosing an interior aqueous space. Liposomes have been used to increase the therapeutic index of a wide range of antineoplastic agents.1 This has primarily been accomplished by improving the pharmacokinetic profile or allowing for site-specific drug delivery to solid tumors. For example, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD; Doxil®,

FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF LIPOSOMES

There are a wide range of factors that influence the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of liposomal nanocarriers. The clearance of a liposome-associated drug from the blood is dependent on: (1) the rate of clearance of the liposomal carrier itself, (2) the rate of disassociation of the complexed, entrapped, or lipid membrane-solubilized drug from the carrier, and the (3) rate of clearance and metabolism of free drug upon its release. The pharmacokinetics of the actual liposomal carriers have

CONTROL OF IN VIVO DRUG RELEASE RATES

The rate of in vivo drug release is an extremely important parameter since it can influence the rate of clearance of the drug from the general circulation, the bioavailability and thus activity of the drug at its site of action, the targetability of the drug, and the observed toxicities.1, 31 Many groups have routinely attempted to demonstrate liposome stability using in vitro incubations in the presence of saline or plasma. Although these somewhat useful preliminary measures of formulation

RELATIONSHIP OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND DRUG RELEASE RATES ON TOXICITY OF LIPOSOMAL DRUGS

The relationship relating pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and toxicity is not as simple as is often suggested. The general dogma is that encapsulation and delivery of therapeutic agents in liposomes results in site-specific delivery of the therapeutic agent to the site of disease, reducing exposure to healthy tissues and increasing the exposure at the site of disease. The logical conclusion that is routinely drawn is that this combination of effects results in a decrease in toxicity for the

EFFECT OF DRUG RELEASE RATES ON ANTITUMOR EFFICACY

Liposomes that displayed longer circulation lifetimes have typically displayed greater antitumor efficacy in various tumor models.1, 2, 31 However, claims of superiority based on pharmacokinetics of the carrier alone must be carefully evaluated since often the differences between the formulations dictate both a change in the pharmacokinetics of the carrier as well as drug retention.217., 218., 219. Although liposomes that display dramatic differences in pharmacokinetics generally show superior

TRIGGERED DELIVERY OF ENCAPSULATED THERAPEUTICS

Triggered delivery of liposomal therapeutics can result from either a stimulus-induced increase in delivery of the liposomal carrier itself to the site of disease or as a result of increased drug release from the carrier. In some instances a particular trigger may be able to induce both increased localization of the liposomal carrier and increased drug release at the site of disease. Ideally, an encapsulated drug would be quantitatively retained in the carrier until the carrier lodges in the

SPECIFIC DELIVERY CHALLENGES FOR NUCLEIC ACIDS

Nucleic acid based therapeutics are seen as a strategy for treating diseases at the level of genetic information transfer. The efficient delivery of these molecules to sites of their intended action remains a major obstacle, and of the available choices of delivery vehicles, nonviral lipid based carriers occupy a prominent place. The ability of a liposome to carry a functional nucleic acid into a cell was demonstrated in the early days of liposome pharmacology.279, 280 However, there is still a

SUMMARY

Significant advances have been made in recent years in controlling the pharmacokinetics and drug release profiles of weakly basic amphiphilic drugs in liposomal carriers. However, there still remains a fair degree of engineering to tailor a specific chemical entity to its carrier even within this class of drugs. Nonetheless, there are currently multiple examples of successfully formulated drugs from this class that are either already approved for use in oncology applications, or are in clinical

Acknowledgements

Much of the work reviewed within was supported by a variety of mechanisms, including a New Investigator Award (Daryl Drummond) from the California Breast Cancer Research Program of the University of California (Grant Number 7KB-0066), as well as grants from the National Cancer Institute Specialized Programs of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Breast Cancer (P50-CA58207) and Brain Tumors (P50-CA097257).

REFERENCES (307)

  • T. Ishida et al.

    Accelerated clearance of PEGylated liposomes in rats after repeated injections

    J Control Release

    (2003)
  • J. Damen et al.

    Transfer and exchange of phospholipid between small unilamellar liposomes and rat plasma high density lipoproteins: Dependence on cholesterol content and phospholipid composition

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (1981)
  • J. Senior et al.

    Stability of small unilamellar liposomes in serum and clearance from the circulation: The effect of the phospholipid and cholesterol components

    Life Sci

    (1982)
  • N. Dos Santos et al.

    Influence of poly(ethylene glycol) grafting density and polymer length on liposomes: Relating plasma circulation lifetimes to protein binding

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (2007)
  • P.G. Tardi et al.

    Coencapsulation of irinotecan and floxuridine into low cholesterol-containing liposomes that coordinate drug release in vivo

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (2007)
  • N. Dos Santos et al.

    Improved retention of idarubicin after intravenous injection obtained for cholesterol-free liposomes

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (2002)
  • M.C. Woodle et al.

    Versatility in lipid compositions showing prolonged circulation with sterically stabilized liposomes

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (1992)
  • T.M. Allen et al.

    Liposomes containing synthetic lipid derivatives of poly(ethylene glycol) show prolonged circulation half-lives in vivo

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (1991)
  • D. Needham et al.

    Elastic deformation and failure of lipid bilayer membranes containing cholesterol

    Biophys J

    (1990)
  • P. Niemela et al.

    Structure and dynamics of sphingomyelin bilayer: Insight gained through systematic comparison to phosphatidylcholine

    Biophys J

    (2004)
  • C.M. Talbott et al.

    Conformational studies of sphingolipids by NMR spectroscopy. II. Sphingomyelin

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (2000)
  • M.J. Johnston et al.

    Characterization of the drug retention and pharmacokinetic properties of liposomal nanoparticles containing dihydrosphingomyelin

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (2007)
  • A. Chonn et al.

    Association of blood proteins with large unilamellar liposomes in vivo: Relation to circulation lifetimes

    J Biol Chem

    (1992)
  • E. Ambegia et al.

    Stabilized plasmid-lipid particles containing PEG-diacylglycerols exhibit extended circulation lifetimes and tumor selective gene expression

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (2005)
  • P.L. Ahl et al.

    Enhancement of the in vivo circulation lifetime of L-alpha-distearoylphosphatidylcholine liposomes: Importance of liposomal aggregation versus complement opsonization

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (1997)
  • A. Chonn et al.

    Separation of large unilamellar liposomes from blood components by a spin column procedure: Towards identifying plasma proteins which mediate liposome clearance in vivo

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (1991)
  • M.J. Parr et al.

    Factors influencing the retention and chemical stability of poly(ethylene glycol)-lipid conjugates incorporated into large unilamellar vesicles

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (1994)
  • M.S. Webb et al.

    Comparison of different hydrophobic anchors conjugated to poly(ethylene glycol): Effects on the pharmacokinetics of liposomal vincristine

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (1998)
  • T. Ishida et al.

    Accelerated blood clearance of PEGylated liposomes following preceding liposome injection: Effects of lipid dose and PEG surface-density and chain length of the first-dose liposomes

    J Control Release

    (2005)
  • X. Wang et al.

    Anti-PEG IgM elicited by injection of liposomes is involved in the enhanced blood clearance of a subsequent dose of PEGylated liposomes

    J Control Release

    (2007)
  • D. Lorusso et al.

    Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin-related palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (‘hand-foot’ syndrome)

    Ann Oncol

    (2007)
  • T.M. Allen et al.

    Pharmacokinetics of stealth versus conventional liposomes: Effect of dose

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (1991)
  • C.D. Oja et al.

    Influence of dose on liposome clearance: Critical role of blood proteins

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (1996)
  • S.C. Semple et al.

    Interactions of liposomes and lipid-based carrier systems with blood proteins: Relation to clearance behaviour in vivo

    Adv Drug Deliv Rev

    (1998)
  • T.M. Allen et al.

    Subcutaneous administration of liposomes: A comparison with the intravenous and intraperitoneal routes of injection

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (1993)
  • S. Mantripragada

    A lipid based depot (DepoFoam technology) for sustained release drug delivery

    Prog Lipid Res

    (2002)
  • C. Oussoren et al.

    Liposomes to target the lymphatics by subcutaneous administration

    Adv Drug Deliv Rev

    (2001)
  • K.D. Wilson et al.

    Effects of intravenous and subcutaneous administration on the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, cellular uptake and immunostimulatory activity of CpG ODN encapsulated in liposomal nanoparticles

    Int Immunopharmacol

    (2007)
  • G.H. Huynh et al.

    Barriers to carrier mediated drug and gene delivery to brain tumors

    J Control Release

    (2006)
  • J.A. MacKay et al.

    Distribution in brain of liposomes after convection enhanced delivery; modulation by particle charge, particle diameter, and presence of steric coating

    Brain Res

    (2005)
  • R. Saito et al.

    Gadolinium-loaded liposomes allow for real-time magnetic resonance imaging of convection-enhanced delivery in the primate brain

    Exp Neurol

    (2005)
  • R. Saito et al.

    Tissue affinity of the infusate affects the distribution volume during convection-enhanced delivery into rodent brains: Implications for local drug delivery

    J Neurosci Methods

    (2006)
  • D.C. Drummond et al.

    Optimizing liposomes for delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to solid tumors

    Pharmacol Rev

    (1999)
  • A. Gabizon et al.

    Pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin: Review of animal and human studies

    Clin Pharmacokinet

    (2003)
  • D.W. Northfelt et al.

    Pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vincristine in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma: Results of a randomized phase III clinical trial

    J Clin Oncol

    (1998)
  • S. Stewart et al.

    Randomized comparative trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus bleomycin and vincristine in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma

    J Clin Oncol

    (1998)
  • F. Muggia et al.

    Phase III data on Caelyx in ovarian cancer

    Eur J Cancer

    (2001)
  • R.M. Rifkin et al.

    Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone provide significant reduction in toxicity compared with doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A Phase III multicenter randomized trial

    Cancer

    (2006)
  • R. Krishna et al.

    Liposomal and nonliposomal drug pharmacokinetics after administration of liposome-encapsulated vincristine and their contribution to drug tissue distribution properties

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (2001)
  • D.C. Drummond et al.

    Development of a highly active nanoliposomal irinotecan using a novel intraliposomal stabilization strategy

    Cancer Res

    (2006)
  • Cited by (241)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text